Skip to content

Roberts v Paterson, 2011 NY Slip Op 04380 [84 AD3d 655]

May 26, 2011

Appellate Division, First Department

— [*1]

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York (Ernst H. Rosenberger of counsel), for appellants.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Laura R. Johnson of counsel), for David A. Paterson, respondent.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Sharyn Rootenberg of counsel), for municipal respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered January 19, 2011, denying plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction requiring defendants to fund health insurance benefits for retirees of the New York City Off-Track Betting Corporation (NYC OTB) pending determination of plaintiffs’ plenary action for the same relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The City and the State are precluded by NY Constitution, article X, § 5, and Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law § 614 from assuming the legal obligation to pay the NYC OTB retirees’ health insurance benefits. Thus, plaintiffs cannot show a probability of success on the merits or otherwise meet the “heightened standard” governing their application for a mandatory preliminary injunction ( see Second on Second Caf�, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc. , 66 AD3d 255 , 264, 273 [2009]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Friedman, Catterson and Richter, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 30096(U).].