People v Yorke, 2016 NY Slip Op 08548 [145 AD3d 920]
December 21, 2016
Appellate Division, Second Department
[*1]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Barry Yorke, Appellant.
Laurette Mulry, Riverhead, NY (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Michael J. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ambro, J.), rendered April 1, 2014, convicting him of criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes , 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ( see People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342 , 349 [2007]). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor ( see People v Mateo , 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; People v Bleakley , 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Romero , 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
The sentence imposed, including the imposition of consecutive sentences for counts one and three, was not harsh or excessive ( see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Balkin, J.P., Austin, Sgroi and LaSalle, JJ., concur..