People v Williams, 2019 NY Slip Op 02914 [171 AD3d 1109]
April 17, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
[*1]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Aaron Williams, Appellant.
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Charity L. Brandy of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthew D’Emic, J.), imposed February 8, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. The Supreme Court’s limited colloquy did not ensure that the defendant understood the nature of the right to appeal or the distinction between the right to appeal and the other trial rights which are forfeited incident to a plea of guilty ( see People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Brown , 122 AD3d 133 , 137-138, 141 [2014]). Under the circumstances here, we conclude that the defendant did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to appeal ( see People v Brown , 122 AD3d 133 [2014]).
Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Austin, J.P., Leventhal, Cohen, Barros and Christopher, JJ., concur..