People v Rodriguez, 21 NY3d 1030 (2013)

2013 NY Slip Op 05719 [21 NY3d 1030]
August 27, 2013
Court of Appeals

[*1]

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Julio Rodriguez, Appellant.

Decided August 27, 2013

People v Rodriguez, 102 AD3d 457, affirmed.

{**21 NY3d at 1031} OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to preserve his claim that he did not receive 20 days’ notice prior to his sex offender designation proceeding as required under Correction Law § 168-n (3). His argument{**21 NY3d at 1032} that an adjournment of unspecified duration was required as a matter of due process is [*2]similarly unreviewable.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.