People v Panton, 27 NY3d 1144 (2016)

2016 NY Slip Op 05181 [27 NY3d 1144]
June 30, 2016
Court of Appeals

[*1]

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Nadine Panton, Appellant.

Argued June 2, 2016; decided June 30, 2016

People v Panton, 114 AD3d 450, affirmed.

{**27 NY3d at 1144} OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre-Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post-{**27 NY3d at 1145} Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did [*2]not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpreserved for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.