People v Lema-Yaucan, 2022 NY Slip Op 01321 [203 AD3d 754]
March 2, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
[*1]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Holger Lema-Yaucan, Appellant.
James D. Licata, New City, NY (Ellen O’Hara Woods of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas E. Walsh II, District Attorney, New City, NY (Jacob B. Sher of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Sherri L. Eisenpress, J.), rendered August 6, 2019, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, strangulation in the second degree, aggravated criminal contempt, and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins , 11 NY3d 484 , 492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes , 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Romero , 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Iannacci, J.P., Miller, Maltese and Dowling, JJ., concur..