People v Boursiquot, 2020 NY Slip Op 05219 [186 AD3d 1704]
September 30, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
[*1]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Gladimir Boursiquot, Appellant.
James D. Licata, New City, NY (Lois Cappelletti of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas E. Walsh II, District Attorney, New City, NY (Tina L. Guccione of counsel; Coleen A. Fortes on the brief), for respondent.
Appeals by the defendant from (1) three judgments of the County Court, Rockland County (David S. Zuckerman, J.), all rendered December 18, 2018, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 18-00097, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 18-00098, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 18-00099, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences, and (2) two amended judgments of the same court, both also rendered December 18, 2018, revoking sentences of probation previously imposed by the same court upon his admissions that he violated conditions thereof, and imposing, respectively, a sentence of imprisonment plus postrelease supervision upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal possession of controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 13-00455, and a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of conspiracy in the fourth degree under indictment No. 13-00460.
Ordered that the judgments and amended judgments are affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal ( see People v Sanders , 25 NY3d 337 , 340-341 [2015]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive ( see People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248 , 256 [2006]). Leventhal, J.P., LaSalle, Brathwaite Nelson and Iannacci, JJ., concur..