Matter of Ursuline Sch. of New Rochelle v Hubert, 2022 NY Slip Op 05326 [208 AD3d 1338]

September 28, 2022

Appellate Division, Second Department

[*1]

In the Matter of Ursuline School of New Rochelle, Petitioner,

v

James W. Hubert, Jr., a Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, et al., Respondents.

Archer & Greiner, P.C., New York, NY (Anthony D. Dougherty and Linda S. Roth of counsel), for petitioner.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Elizabeth A. Figueira of counsel), for respondent James W. Hubert, Jr.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, James W. Hubert, Jr., a Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to determine two motions filed in an action entitled P. v Ursuline Sch. of New Rochelle , commenced in that court under index No. 63745/21.

Adjudged that the petition is denied as academic and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

In an order dated April 22, 2022, the respondent James W. Hubert, Jr., determined the subject motions. Accordingly, this proceeding has been rendered academic.

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Iannacci, J.P., Rivera, Zayas and Dowling, JJ., concur..