Matter of Lewis v Bogle, 2020 NY Slip Op 01618 [181 AD3d 676]

March 11, 2020

Appellate Division, Second Department

[*1]

In the Matter of Justin Lewis, Petitioner,

v

Robert Bogle et al., Respondents.

Justin Lewis, East Meadow, NY, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent Robert Bogle.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Brittany R. Gurrieri of counsel), respondent pro se.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondents from taking further action in a criminal action entitled People v Lewis , pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under indictment No. 638/19, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further, Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” ( Matter of Holtzman v Goldman , 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue , 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Chambers, J.P., Leventhal, Brathwaite Nelson and Wooten, JJ., concur..