Flores v Langsam Prop. Servs. Corp, 13 NY3d 811 (2009)

2009 NY Slip Op 07456 [13 NY3d 811]
October 20, 2009
Court of Appeals

[*1]

Eva Flores, Appellant,
v
Langsam Property Services Corp. et al., Respondents.

Decided October 20, 2009

Flores v Langsam Prop. Servs. Corp., 63 AD3d 502, affirmed.

{**13 NY3d at 812} OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding defendants’ actual or constructive notice of the particular dangerous condition that allegedly caused her injuries (see [*2]Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 838 [1986]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.