DoIt Hospitality Del. LLC v Reuben Bros. Ltd., 2023 NY Slip Op 06201 [221 AD3d 564]
November 30, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
[*1]
DoIt Hospitality Delaware LLC, Appellant,
v
Reuben Brothers Limited et al., Respondents.
Morrison Cohen LLP, New York (Aaron B. Lauchheimer of counsel), for appellant.
Reed Smith LLP, New York (John C. Scalzo of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Reed, J.), entered February 5, 2023, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted, based on the so-ordered hearing transcript, partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s second cause of action as duplicative of the first cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Both the first cause of action alleging a violation of New York UCC 9-610 (b) requirement that the disposition of collateral be “commercially reasonable” in terms of “method, manner, time [and] place,” and the second cause of action alleging a breach of the Pledge and Security Agreement Section 8 (c) requirement that a sale of the collateral at public auction be for “fair market value,” require a showing by plaintiff that the auction here was a commercially reasonable sale. Even though that fact has not yet been established, the court correctly dismissed the second cause of action as duplicative of the first because plaintiff cannot show that the Section 8 (c) language specifying that lender defendant Reuben Brothers was obligated to dispose of the collateral for fair market value imposed an obligation independent from and beyond the UCC commercially reasonable obligation, which, in the case of a properly conducted public auction, necessarily produces a sale for fair market value, consistent with the meaning of that term as used in Section 8 (c) ( see generally Matter of Excello Press, Inc. , 890 F2d 896 [7th Cir 1989]). Concur—Kapnick, J.P., Webber, Singh, Moulton, Scarpulla, JJ..