Skip to content

Arts4All, Ltd. v Hancock, 13 NY3d 812 (2009)

2009 NY Slip Op 07455 [13 NY3d 812]
October 20, 2009
Court of Appeals

[*1]

Arts4All, Ltd., et al., Respondents,
v
Judith L. Hancock, Appellant, and Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant. Daniel Y.C. Ng et al., Additional Counterclaim Defendants, and Peter Osgood, Additional Counterclaim Defendant-Respondent.

Decided October 20, 2009

Arts4All, Ltd. v Hancock, 54 AD3d 286, affirmed.

{**13 NY3d at 813} OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. The courts below did not abuse their discretion in dismissing defendant’s counterclaims pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3) (see Arts4All, Ltd. v Hancock, 12 NY3d 846 [2009]). Defendant’s remaining argument is without merit.

Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.