Skip to content

People v Feliciano, 22 NY3d 986 (2013)

2013 NY Slip Op 07764 [22 NY3d 986]
November 21, 2013
Court of Appeals

[*1]

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Wilson Feliciano, Appellant.

Decided November 21, 2013

People v Feliciano, 101 AD3d 617, affirmed.

{**22 NY3d at 987} OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that he completed the terms of his original plea agreement and was therefore entitled to dismissal of the indictment is not preserved for our review. Upon his discharge, defendant did not move for dismissal following the events that he now says [*2]constituted performance of the agreement.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.