Reversed by Millennium Holdings LLC v Glidden Co., 27 NY3d 406 (2016)
Millennium Holdings LLC v Glidden Co., 2014 NYSlipOp 06772 [121 AD3d 444]
October 7, 2014
Appellate Division, First Department
[*1]
Millennium Holdings LLC, Plaintiff, and The Northern Assurance Company of America, Appellant, and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s et al., Intervenor-Appellants,
v
The Glidden Company, Now Known as Akzo Nobel Paints, et al., Respondents.
Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, Washington, D.C. (Jason M. Knott of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for appellants.
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York (Maura K. Monaghan and James Amler of counsel), for respondents.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from orders of the Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered November 26, 2013, and said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the orders so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed for the reasons stated by Kornreich, J. Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ..